<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cigar Review: Fuente Opus X &#8220;Love Affair&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lindsayheller.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=54" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lindsayheller.com/?p=54</link>
	<description>Discussions on My Three Guilty Pleasures: Tobacco, Wine and Food</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:20:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jr cigars</title>
		<link>http://www.lindsayheller.com/?p=54&#038;cpage=1#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>jr cigars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindsayheller.com/?p=54#comment-177</guid>
		<description>[...] will mark the 3rd annual event, or holiday if you will. So mark your calendars now as it is rightThe Holy Trinity - Discussions on My Three Guilty Pleasures ...Carlito Fuente Jr. seems a bit too bent on making a profit from the ... Name (required) Mail (will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will mark the 3rd annual event, or holiday if you will. So mark your calendars now as it is rightThe Holy Trinity &#8211; Discussions on My Three Guilty Pleasures &#8230;Carlito Fuente Jr. seems a bit too bent on making a profit from the &#8230; Name (required) Mail (will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CLXXIII</title>
		<link>http://www.lindsayheller.com/?p=54&#038;cpage=1#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CLXXIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindsayheller.com/?p=54#comment-46</guid>
		<description>[...] Carrillo Edicion Inaugural 2009. Velvet Cigar reviews the Room 101 by Camacho. A Cigar Smoker and Lindsay Heller both smoke the Opus X &#8220;Love [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Carrillo Edicion Inaugural 2009. Velvet Cigar reviews the Room 101 by Camacho. A Cigar Smoker and Lindsay Heller both smoke the Opus X &#8220;Love [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right_hook</title>
		<link>http://www.lindsayheller.com/?p=54&#038;cpage=1#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>right_hook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 05:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindsayheller.com/?p=54#comment-26</guid>
		<description>lindsay:

i will not digitize an opus about the matter; except to assert that i have begun a love affair with the holy trinity [with the exception of the &quot;guilt.&quot;]

as a former therapist once put it: &quot;guilt is the mafia of the mind.&quot;

keep on bringing the trinity to cyberspace. . . . in the name of  single malt, women and song.

please excuse me while i light my stogie.  as  there&#039;s no such thing as a hands free stick.

all good things to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lindsay:</p>
<p>i will not digitize an opus about the matter; except to assert that i have begun a love affair with the holy trinity [with the exception of the "guilt."]</p>
<p>as a former therapist once put it: &#8220;guilt is the mafia of the mind.&#8221;</p>
<p>keep on bringing the trinity to cyberspace. . . . in the name of  single malt, women and song.</p>
<p>please excuse me while i light my stogie.  as  there&#8217;s no such thing as a hands free stick.</p>
<p>all good things to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.lindsayheller.com/?p=54&#038;cpage=1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindsayheller.com/?p=54#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Oh I smoked that one to death.  Needed a month or two more in the box unfortunately.  I&#039;ve enjoyed those quite a bit before.  This one came out of a sampler I got for Christmas. 

But the spot looked precisely like that, almost like a splash of wax.  Problem is now I don&#039;t recall if it was under the band or just on the outside.  I seem to recall it being on the outside.  

I&#039;ll keep my eyes open for something similar as I smoke more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I smoked that one to death.  Needed a month or two more in the box unfortunately.  I&#8217;ve enjoyed those quite a bit before.  This one came out of a sampler I got for Christmas. </p>
<p>But the spot looked precisely like that, almost like a splash of wax.  Problem is now I don&#8217;t recall if it was under the band or just on the outside.  I seem to recall it being on the outside.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll keep my eyes open for something similar as I smoke more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cigar Inspector</title>
		<link>http://www.lindsayheller.com/?p=54&#038;cpage=1#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Cigar Inspector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindsayheller.com/?p=54#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Nice &amp; honest review.
The only Opus X I smoked was the 1992 Reserve (3-tin). It was a couple of years ago and the cigars were stellar, I haven&#039;t had a better Dominican puro since.
I tend to agree with you about the overextension of the line though. It seems like most of the reviews of those &quot;limited&quot; sticks indicate that they are hardly worth the money.
Keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice &amp; honest review.<br />
The only Opus X I smoked was the 1992 Reserve (3-tin). It was a couple of years ago and the cigars were stellar, I haven&#8217;t had a better Dominican puro since.<br />
I tend to agree with you about the overextension of the line though. It seems like most of the reviews of those &#8220;limited&#8221; sticks indicate that they are hardly worth the money.<br />
Keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay</title>
		<link>http://www.lindsayheller.com/?p=54&#038;cpage=1#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindsayheller.com/?p=54#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike!

     The splotch you saw in the picture where I was holding the cigar was underneath the cigar band itself--it was actually that small piece of wrapper I mentioned came off after quite carefully removing the Opus band.

     I regret not photographing the glue spots on the cigar before I smoked it, but Barry was totally aware of what I had on my cigar despite his having no blemishes whatsoever. Basically it looked like something along the lines of shiny donut glaze, but it was very thin, super shiny, and wasn&#039;t sticky to the touch. (It obviously discolours the wrapper in those spots, so it&#039;s hard to miss.)  I immediately knew it was glue, but Barry had another interesting theory that didn&#039;t apply since the cigar wasn&#039;t cedar-wrapped.  (He suggested that he has seen a similar occurance when cedar-wrapped cigars, i.e. H Upmann Vintage Cameroon Toros, where it&#039;s almost as if the wood while breathing excuded some sort of sap-like substance onto the wrapper.)

    If you can take a picture of the RyJ cigar in question I&#039;d be happy to give you my professional opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike!</p>
<p>     The splotch you saw in the picture where I was holding the cigar was underneath the cigar band itself&#8211;it was actually that small piece of wrapper I mentioned came off after quite carefully removing the Opus band.</p>
<p>     I regret not photographing the glue spots on the cigar before I smoked it, but Barry was totally aware of what I had on my cigar despite his having no blemishes whatsoever. Basically it looked like something along the lines of shiny donut glaze, but it was very thin, super shiny, and wasn&#8217;t sticky to the touch. (It obviously discolours the wrapper in those spots, so it&#8217;s hard to miss.)  I immediately knew it was glue, but Barry had another interesting theory that didn&#8217;t apply since the cigar wasn&#8217;t cedar-wrapped.  (He suggested that he has seen a similar occurance when cedar-wrapped cigars, i.e. H Upmann Vintage Cameroon Toros, where it&#8217;s almost as if the wood while breathing excuded some sort of sap-like substance onto the wrapper.)</p>
<p>    If you can take a picture of the RyJ cigar in question I&#8217;d be happy to give you my professional opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.lindsayheller.com/?p=54&#038;cpage=1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindsayheller.com/?p=54#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Is that splotch a glue spot?  I saw that on an RyJ Maduro Reserve I smoked a few days ago and thought somehow I&#039;d gotten a drop of water on it through some monumental mishandling during coolidor construction.  (Very unlikely but I couldn&#039;t come up with any other scenario.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that splotch a glue spot?  I saw that on an RyJ Maduro Reserve I smoked a few days ago and thought somehow I&#8217;d gotten a drop of water on it through some monumental mishandling during coolidor construction.  (Very unlikely but I couldn&#8217;t come up with any other scenario.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
